From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Modica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1983
92 A.D.2d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

February 14, 1983


In a medical malpractice action, defendant St. John's Episcopal Hospital appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated October 7, 1981, as granted plaintiffs' motion to vacate its amended interrogatories dated May 26, 1981. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. Special Term was well within its discretion in vacating appellant's amended interrogatories in their entirety pursuant to its broad power to regulate discovery to prevent abuse (see CPLR 3103, subd [a]; 3133; Kay v. Shopwell, Inc., 63 A.D.2d 694; Katz v. Posner, 23 A.D.2d 774). The amended interrogatories are patently burdensome, oppressive and improper; indeed, an examination of the amended interrogatories indicates that they are nothing more than a rearranged version of a previously served set of interrogatories which was also vacated by Special Term pursuant to an order dated February 11, 1981. The amended interrogatories were properly vacated rather than pruned ( Vancek v. International Dynetics Corp., 78 A.D.2d 842; Barouh Eaton Allen Corp. v. International Business Machs. Corp., 76 A.D.2d 873). We take this opportunity to again remind the Bar, including appellant's counsel, that "[t]he burden of serving a proper demand is upon counsel and not for the courts to correct a palpably bad one" ( Itzkoff v. Allstate Ins. Co., 59 A.D.2d 854, 855; see Martino v. Mid-Island Hosp., 73 A.D.2d 592). Damiani, J.P., Mangano, Thompson and Boyers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Roberts v. Modica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1983
92 A.D.2d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Roberts v. Modica

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPHINE ROBERTS et al., Respondents, v. RALPH MODICA et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 14, 1983

Citations

92 A.D.2d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

Penn v. Jaros, Baum Bolles, Kidde PLC Inc.

Interrogatories which are "patently burdensome, oppressive and improper" should be stricken by the Court.…

Senior v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs. Special Term properly vacated the discovery…