From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Mahoning County

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Aug 2, 2006
495 F. Supp. 2d 712 (N.D. Ohio 2006)

Opinion

No. 4:03 CV 2329.

August 2, 2006

BATCHELDER, DOWD and POLSTER, District Judges.

Robert P. Armbruster, Armbruster, Kelley, Kot, Honeck Baker, Akron, OH, for Plaintiffs.

Sharon K. Hackett, Linette M. Stratford, Paul J. Gains, Office of the Prosecuting Attorney, Youngstown, OH, Daniel T. Downey, Mark D. Landes, Isaac, Brant, Ledman Teetor, Columbus, OH, Thomas N. Michaels, Cleveland, OH, for Defendants.

Thomas Kelley, Armbruster, Kelley, Kot, Honeck Baker, Akron, OH.


ORDER


Before the Court is the motion to intervene filed by the City of Youngstown pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3626(a)(3)(F). (Doc. No. 207). The motion is granted.

Counsel for the City of Youngstown is directed to file the Complaint in Intervention which was attached to the motion, taking care to use the event "Intervenor's Complaint" when making this electronic filing.

Counsel should also be sure to file a clean copy, not the one currently attached to the motion, which contains an automatic header labeling it as Doc. No. 207-3. The ECF system will attached a new header once the new document is filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Roberts v. Mahoning County

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Aug 2, 2006
495 F. Supp. 2d 712 (N.D. Ohio 2006)
Case details for

Roberts v. Mahoning County

Case Details

Full title:Nathaniel ROBERTS, et al., Plaintiff(s), v. MAHONING COUNTY, etc., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Aug 2, 2006

Citations

495 F. Supp. 2d 712 (N.D. Ohio 2006)

Citing Cases

Roberts v. Mahoning County

In accordance with the District Court's May 25, 2006 Order (Doc. No. 193), this Three Judge Court was…