From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Herrington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Apr 4, 2013
No. 5:12-cv-188-DPM-HDY (E.D. Ark. Apr. 4, 2013)

Opinion

No. 5:12-cv-188-DPM-HDY

04-04-2013

BRUNSON ROBERTS ADC # 127841 PLAINTIFF v. JOHN HERRINGTON; BRIAN LEVENGOOD; RAY HOBBS; RAYMOND NAYLOR; G. LAY; M. WARNER; V. ROBERTSON; J. HOLSTEAD; TINA GIBSON; MERLIN FITZPATRICK; and JOHN DOES DEFENDANTS


ORDER

Roberts moves to dismiss all his claims against Fitzpatrick and Gibson, acknowledging no exhaustion. Magistrate Judge Deere recommends a grant, Document No. 35, and no one has objected. Motion, Document No. 34, granted. All Roberts's claims against Merlin Fitzpatrick and Tina Gibson are dismissed without prejudice

So Ordered.

_______________

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Roberts v. Herrington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Apr 4, 2013
No. 5:12-cv-188-DPM-HDY (E.D. Ark. Apr. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Roberts v. Herrington

Case Details

Full title:BRUNSON ROBERTS ADC # 127841 PLAINTIFF v. JOHN HERRINGTON; BRIAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Apr 4, 2013

Citations

No. 5:12-cv-188-DPM-HDY (E.D. Ark. Apr. 4, 2013)