From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Herrington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Dec 17, 2012
No. 5:12-cv-188-DPM-HDY (E.D. Ark. Dec. 17, 2012)

Opinion

No. 5:12-cv-188-DPM-HDY

12-17-2012

BRUNSON ROBERTS ADC # 127841 PLAINTIFF v. JOHN HERRINGTON; BRIAN LEVENGOOD; RAY HOBBS; RAYMOND NAYLOR; G. LAY; M. WARNER; v. ROBERTSON; J. HOLSTEAD; TINA GIBSON; MERLIN FITZPATRICK; and JOHN DOES DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Young's Proposed Findings and Recommendations, Document No. 19, Roberts's objections, Document No. 20, and a response from Defendants Herrington, Fitzpatrick, Gibson, and Levengood, Document No. 21. After carefully considering the responses and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations as its own. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The John Does are dismissed from this action without prejudice.

So Ordered.

______________________

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Roberts v. Herrington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Dec 17, 2012
No. 5:12-cv-188-DPM-HDY (E.D. Ark. Dec. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Roberts v. Herrington

Case Details

Full title:BRUNSON ROBERTS ADC # 127841 PLAINTIFF v. JOHN HERRINGTON; BRIAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Dec 17, 2012

Citations

No. 5:12-cv-188-DPM-HDY (E.D. Ark. Dec. 17, 2012)