From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robert Sloane v. Roseann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 2, 1996
234 A.D.2d 281 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

December 2, 1996.

In an action, inter alia, pursuant to Town Law § 268 (2) to enforce a zoning ordinance, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), dated November 15, 1995, which granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint.

Before: Mangano, P.J., Miller, Ritter and Thompson, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs failed to appeal the determination of the Town of Warwick Building Inspector to the Town of Warwick Zoning Board of Appeals ( see, Town Law § 267-a; Warwick Town Code § 164-53 [2]). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the action on the ground that the plaintiffs failed to exhaust their administrative remedies ( see, Matter of Nautilus Landowners Corp. v Harbor Commn., 232 AD2d 418; Matter of We're Assocs. Co. v Commissioner of Dept. of Planning Dev. of Town of Oyster Bay, 185 AD2d 820; see also, Matter of Glengariff Health Care Ctr. v New York State Dept. of Health, 205 AD2d 626).


Summaries of

Robert Sloane v. Roseann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 2, 1996
234 A.D.2d 281 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Robert Sloane v. Roseann

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT SLOANE et al., Appellants, v. ROSEANN M. AN NUNZIATO et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 2, 1996

Citations

234 A.D.2d 281 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
651 N.Y.S.2d 309