From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robert-Arthur Mgmt. v. Tenn. ex Rel. Canale

U.S.
Jan 15, 1968
389 U.S. 578 (1968)

Summary

holding not obscene a movie which informs people that "sexual filth" exists in the world

Summary of this case from Duggan v. Guild Theatre, Inc.

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE.

No. 679.

Decided January 15, 1968.

Longstreet Heiskell for appellant.

George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Thomas E. Fox, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.


The judgment of the Supreme Court of Tennessee is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE would affirm.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would affirm for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, 500-503, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455.


Summaries of

Robert-Arthur Mgmt. v. Tenn. ex Rel. Canale

U.S.
Jan 15, 1968
389 U.S. 578 (1968)

holding not obscene a movie which informs people that "sexual filth" exists in the world

Summary of this case from Duggan v. Guild Theatre, Inc.
Case details for

Robert-Arthur Mgmt. v. Tenn. ex Rel. Canale

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT-ARTHUR MANAGEMENT CORP. v . TENNESSEE EX REL. CANALE, DISTRICT…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 15, 1968

Citations

389 U.S. 578 (1968)

Citing Cases

State v. Lebewitz

See, State v. Hoelscher, 294 Minn. 433, 202 N.W.2d 640 (1972). Hartstein v. Missouri, 404 U.S. 988, 92 S.Ct.…

State v. Hoyt

220 Tenn. 113, 414 S.W.2d 643. Notwithstanding these findings, the decision was reversed by the United States…