In Roberge v. Winne, this court was confronted with conflicting testimony concerning whether a document offered in evidence was proper to be received.
Summary of this case from People v. MarksArgued December 20, 1894
Decided February 8, 1895
Edmund Luis Mooney for appellants.
Frank H. Gray for respondent.
O'BRIEN, J., reads for affirmance; FINCH, J., concurs; ANDREWS, Ch. J., PECKHAM, GRAY and BARTLETT, JJ., concur in result; HAIGHT, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
In Roberge v. Winne, this court was confronted with conflicting testimony concerning whether a document offered in evidence was proper to be received.
Summary of this case from People v. MarksFull title:FRANKLIN P. ROBERGE, Respondent, v . MARIA N. WINNE et al., Appellants
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 8, 1895
This was held not specifically enforcible because a material element of what was to be done was left open for…
Winne v. Winneintained for the specific performance of an agreement, although an action at law could not be based upon it,…