From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robbins v. Mumtaz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Nov 30, 2012
CASE NO: 5:12CV00417 BSM/BD (E.D. Ark. Nov. 30, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO: 5:12CV00417 BSM/BD

11-30-2012

RANDAL L. ROBBINS, ADC # 147782 PLAINTIFF v. MUMTAZ, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The proposed findings and partial recommended disposition [Doc. No. 5] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere and the objections thereto have been reviewed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, it is found that the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT plaintiff Randal Robbins's Fourteenth Amendment Due Process and Equal Protection, Americans with Disabilities Act, and Rehabilitation Act claims be dismissed without prejudice.

_______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Robbins v. Mumtaz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Nov 30, 2012
CASE NO: 5:12CV00417 BSM/BD (E.D. Ark. Nov. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Robbins v. Mumtaz

Case Details

Full title:RANDAL L. ROBBINS, ADC # 147782 PLAINTIFF v. MUMTAZ, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Nov 30, 2012

Citations

CASE NO: 5:12CV00417 BSM/BD (E.D. Ark. Nov. 30, 2012)