Opinion
November 17, 1986
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Imperato, R., Schneier, J.).
Ordered that the order dated May 14, 1984 is affirmed insofar as appealed from, and the order dated November 2, 1984 is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The law is clear that any award of costs and counsel fees in connection with a custody proceeding or for bringing an appeal to this court is a matter to be resolved by the court before whom the application was made, as an exercise of its discretion (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237 [b]). Based on the instant record, there was no abuse of that discretion (see, Matter of Bonnaci v Bonnaci, 89 A.D.2d 634). Thompson, J.P., Brown, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.