From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Road Dist. No. v. McElwrath

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio
Dec 6, 1933
64 S.W.2d 1109 (Tex. Civ. App. 1933)

Opinion

No. 9164.

November 8, 1933. Rehearing Denied December 6, 1933.

Appeal from District Court, Willacy County; A. M. Kent, Judge.

Suit by F. P. McElwrath against Road District No. 5 and others. An order or judgment overruling the plea of intervention of certain third parties and overruling their motion for a new trial was entered, and such third parties appeal from the judgment. On motion to dismiss the appeal.

Motion granted, and the appeal dismissed.

Greenwood Lewis, of Harlingen, for appellants.

Jesse G. Foster, of Raymondville, for appellee.


E. P. McElwrath, appellee herein, instituted this suit, on the 29th day of November, 1932, in the district court of Willacy county, against road district No. 5, of that county, and others, seeking to recover certain sums of money alleged to be due him by reason of services rendered and work done in said road district. On the same day R.S. Dorsett, as county judge of Willacy county, filed a waiver of service and attempted to enter appearance for all defendants.

On December 5, 1932, A. B. Crane, R. F. Robinson, and W. B. Lewis, as friends of the court, filed a motion suggesting the insufficiency of this waiver of service. Thereafter, on this same date, the commissioners' court filed a waiver of service signed by the county judge and two commissioners.

On December 12, 1932, an agreed judgment was rendered in the case.

On December 16, 1932, certain resident taxpayers and property owners of road district No. 5 filed a motion for a new trial and also a plea of intervention. The motion for a new trial was overruled, and the plea of intervention refused. The interveners gave notice of appeal.

Appellee has moved to dismiss this appeal, as none of the defendants below have given notice or attempted to appeal in any way.

The appellants herein are those who made an unsuccessful attempt to intervene in this cause four days after final judgment had been rendered. Appellants are not parties to the judgment, and have no right of appeal. 3 Tex.Juris. p. 145, § 81.

Appellee's motion to dismiss will be granted, and the appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Road Dist. No. v. McElwrath

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio
Dec 6, 1933
64 S.W.2d 1109 (Tex. Civ. App. 1933)
Case details for

Road Dist. No. v. McElwrath

Case Details

Full title:ROAD DIST. NO. 5 et al. v. McELWRATH

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio

Date published: Dec 6, 1933

Citations

64 S.W.2d 1109 (Tex. Civ. App. 1933)

Citing Cases

Nacol v. State

By definition, one who seeks to intervene is not a party to the proceedings. Therefore, once Nacol's and…