From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivet v. Regions Bank of Louisiana

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 20, 1998
139 F.3d 512 (5th Cir. 1998)

Opinion

No. 95-30524.

April 20, 1998.

John Gregory Odom, Stuart E. Des Roches, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

John M. Landis, Stephanie Shuler, Stone, Pigman, Walther, Wittmann Hutchinson, New Orleans, La, for Regions Bank of Louisiana, F.S.B.

Michael H. Rubin, McGlinchey, Stafford Lang, Baton Rouge, La, Charles R. Penot, Jr., New Orleans, LA, for Walter and Perry Brown.

Charles L. Stern, Jr., Steeg O'Connor, Richard Thomas Gallagher, Jr., Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere Denegre, New Orleans, LA, for Fountainbleu Storage Associates.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Before: JONES and WIENER, Circuit Judges, and FURGESON, District Judge.

District Judge of the Western District of Texas, sitting by designation.


IT IS ORDERED that the subject case be and it is hereby remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the United States Supreme Court, filed February 24, 1998.

Mary Anna Rivet, et al., Petitioners v. Regions Bank of Louisiana, et al., No. 96-1971, slip op. 522 U.S. (February 24, 1998).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of plaintiffs-appellants-petitioners Mary Anna Rivet, et al., to set briefing schedule and hearing for fixing of award of costs and attorneys' fees be and it is hereby denied, without prejudice to filing such a motion in the United States District Court to which this case is remanded, that court being the more appropriate forum in which to commence such proceedings.


Summaries of

Rivet v. Regions Bank of Louisiana

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 20, 1998
139 F.3d 512 (5th Cir. 1998)
Case details for

Rivet v. Regions Bank of Louisiana

Case Details

Full title:MARY ANNA RIVET, MINNA REE WINER, EDMOND G. MIRANNE, AND EDMOND G…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Apr 20, 1998

Citations

139 F.3d 512 (5th Cir. 1998)

Citing Cases

Petro-Hunt L.L.C. v. U.S.

This court finds that all four elements are met. Elements (i), (ii) and (iv) are not major points of…