From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivero v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 26, 2000
758 So. 2d 723 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 4D00-0964.

Opinion filed April 26, 2000.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Howard C. Berman, Judge; L.T. No. 97-3619CFA02.

Lazaro B. Rivero, Jasper, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


Lazaro Rivero appeals the denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence, in which he sought resentencing under Heggs v. State, 2000 WL 178052 (Fla. February 17, 2000) (slip op.). We affirm the denial because his motion does not allege the date of his offense, and therefore does not demonstrate that his case fell within the window period during which Chapter 95-184 was unconstitutional. Affirmance is without prejudice to Rivero to file a new motion in the trial court that alleges the date of his offense and shows that he has standing to challenge his sentence on this ground.

WARNER, C.J., STONE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rivero v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 26, 2000
758 So. 2d 723 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Rivero v. State

Case Details

Full title:LAZARO B. RIVERO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 26, 2000

Citations

758 So. 2d 723 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Szymanowski v. State

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant to file a new motion in the trial court which alleges the date of his…

Smith v. State

We affirm the trial court's order because Smith's motion is facially insufficient, but without prejudice to…