From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivera v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 8, 2002
806 So. 2d 631 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 1D99-2462

Opinion filed February 8, 2002.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County. Larry G. Turner, Judge.

Paula C. Coffman, Orlando, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Felicia A. Wilcox, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


We affirm the appellant's conviction because he fails to present any meritorious claims, and conclude that the trial court did not err by resentencing the appellant to an upward departure sentence. See Trotter v. State, 774 So.2d 924, 925 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (remanding for Heggs resentencing and holding the trial court could depart from the guidelines if valid reasons for a departure existed at the time of the original sentencing, and the new sentence does not exceed the original).

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, PADOVANO and POLSTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rivera v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 8, 2002
806 So. 2d 631 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Rivera v. State

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT RIVERA, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 8, 2002

Citations

806 So. 2d 631 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Lawson v. State

Thus, the trial court had the authority at the de novo sentencing hearing to exercise its discretion in…

Lanier v. State

AFFIRMED. See Lawson v. State, 812 So.2d 518 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 829 So.2d 918 (Fla. 2002); Rivera…