From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivardeneria v. N.Y.C. Health and Hosp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 2003
306 A.D.2d 394 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-05554, 2002-11525

Submitted May 28, 2003.

June 16, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for assault and battery, the nonparty, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman Dicker, LLP, appeals (1) from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), dated April 26, 2002, as denied its motion to be relieved as counsel for the defendant Shahab Ataee, and (2), as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the same court dated December 4, 2002, as, upon renewal and reargument, adhered to the prior determination.

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman Dicker, LLP, New York, N.Y. (James S. Brown, Cynthia Neugebauer, and Richard E. Lerner of counsel), nonparty-appellant pro se.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, THOMAS A. ADAMS, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal from the order dated April 26, 2002, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that order was superseded by the order dated December 4, 2002, made upon reargument and renewal; and it is further,

ORDERED that the order dated December 4, 2002, is reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, upon reargument and renewal, the motion is granted, and so much of the order dated April 26, 2002, as denied the motion is vacated.

As a general rule, an attorney may terminate the attorney-client relationship at any time for a good and sufficient cause and upon reasonable notice (see Matter of Dunn, 205 N.Y. 398, 403; Lake v. M.P.C. Trucking, 279 A.D.2d 813). While the decision to grant or deny permission for counsel to withdraw lies within the discretion of the trial court (see Tartaglione v. Tiffany, 280 A.D.2d 543; Cashdan v. Cashdan, 243 A.D.2d 598), given the potential conflict of interest in the appellant's continued representation of the defendant Shahab Ataee, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the appellant's motion to be relieved as counsel (see 22 NYCRR 1200.15[b][2]; 1200.24[b]).

FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, FRIEDMANN, ADAMS and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rivardeneria v. N.Y.C. Health and Hosp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 2003
306 A.D.2d 394 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Rivardeneria v. N.Y.C. Health and Hosp

Case Details

Full title:PAULINE RIVARDENERIA, plaintiff, v. NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 16, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 394 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
760 N.Y.S.2d 877

Citing Cases

Valladres v. Pavarini McGovern, LLC

Upon the foregoing papers, Subin & Associate (Subin)'s order to show cause (OSC) to be relieved as counsel…

Penafiel v. Britt Realty, LLC

Upon the foregoing papers, Subin & Associate (Subin)'s order to show cause (OSC) to be relieved as counsel…