From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ritter v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 6, 2018
CASE NO. 1:18CV826 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 6, 2018)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:18CV826

09-06-2018

FRANKLIN RITTER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL DAVIS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation (Doc.#32) of Magistrate Judge Baughman regarding Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc.#12). This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Baughman for general pretrial supervision. The Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendants' Motion be DENIED. Defendants have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation.

FED. R. CIV.P. 72(b) provides that objections to a Report and Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after service, but Defendants have failed to timely file any such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that Defendants are satisfied with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court's limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir.1981).

Therefore, the Court adopts in full the Report and Recommendation (Doc.# 32 ) and denies Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 9/6/2018

S/Christopher A . Boyko

CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ritter v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 6, 2018
CASE NO. 1:18CV826 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 6, 2018)
Case details for

Ritter v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:FRANKLIN RITTER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL DAVIS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 6, 2018

Citations

CASE NO. 1:18CV826 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 6, 2018)