From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ringhoffer v. Ringhoffer

Superior Court Hartford County
Jan 26, 1935
1 Conn. Supp. 35 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1935)

Opinion

File No. 49787

G. C. Lessner, Attorney for the Plaintiff.

W.S. Hyde, Attorney for the Defendant.

Decree of divorce obtained in Mexico declared void. Evidence held to furnish a reasonable inference that defendant (plaintiff in the then cause) had no residence in Mexico at the time the decree purported to issue. Declaratory judgment directed.

MEMORANDUM FILED JANUARY 26, 1935.


It is not disputed that the defendant obtained the so-called Judgment of Divorce without establishing any residence in Mexico. The evidence furnishes a reasonable inference that he was not even in that country at that time it purported to issue. He admits in pleading the judgment is a nullity. It is found the alleged judgment was of no effect. (Connecticut vs. Cooke) 110 Conn. 348.)

The plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment. It is found the recorded judgment of another state has cast uncertainty upon her jural relation within the meaning of the act.


Summaries of

Ringhoffer v. Ringhoffer

Superior Court Hartford County
Jan 26, 1935
1 Conn. Supp. 35 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1935)
Case details for

Ringhoffer v. Ringhoffer

Case Details

Full title:LENA GASPAR RINGHOFFER vs. AUGUST HARRY RINGHOFFER

Court:Superior Court Hartford County

Date published: Jan 26, 1935

Citations

1 Conn. Supp. 35 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1935)

Citing Cases

Matter of Caeti

The objectant has not cited any case or statute to support her position that the law of Connecticut is other…

Matter of Caeti

The objectant has not cited any case or statute to support her position that the law of Connecticut is other…