From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ringe v. Mortimer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 11, 1907
116 App. Div. 722 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)

Opinion

January 11, 1907.

Warren S. Burt, for the appellant.

William H. Cochran, for the respondent.


This is an appeal from an order of the Special Term vacating an order granted under section 1391 of the Code of Civil Procedure, directing that execution issue against part of the income payable to the defendant from a trust during his life, and vacating the execution issued thereunder. The trust was created under a will probated in 1894. The amendment by chapter 175 of the Laws of 1905 of section 1391 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as amended by chapter 461 of the Laws of 1903, does not affect the full application of the judgments of the first department of this court in King v. Irving ( 103 App. Div. 420) and Sloane v. Tiffany (Id. 540). I am of opinion that we should follow them, and I, therefore, advise the affirmance of the order, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

WOODWARD, HOOKER and RICH, JJ., concurred; GAYNOR, J., concurred in result.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Ringe v. Mortimer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 11, 1907
116 App. Div. 722 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
Case details for

Ringe v. Mortimer

Case Details

Full title:HENRY RINGE, Appellant, v . JOHN MORTIMER, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 11, 1907

Citations

116 App. Div. 722 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
101 N.Y.S. 1110

Citing Cases

Kelly v. Mulcahy

But the amendment did not apply to judgments recovered before it took effect, which was September 1, 1908. It…

Demuth v. Kemp

A motion was thereafter made by the defendant to vacate such order, which was denied, and defendant appeals.…