Opinion
Submitted October 31, 1941 —
Decided January 9, 1942.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 126 N.J.L. 446.
For the appellant, Edward A. Haffer.
For the respondent, Nathan W. Goldberg.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.