From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rina v. Windemere Home Owners Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 13, 2009
66 A.D.3d 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-08300.

October 13, 2009.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant DeBenedittis Landscaping, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Diamond, J.), dated July 17, 2008, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

James R. Pieret, Garden City, N.Y., for appellant.

Friedman Simon, LLP, Jericho, N.Y. (Lauren Cristofano of counsel), for plaintiffs-respondents.

McCabe, Collins, McGeough Fowler, LLP, Carle Place, N.Y. (Patrick M. Murphy of counsel), for defendants-respondents Robert Silverman and Debra Laitman Silverman.

Before: Fisher, J.P., Balkin, Hall and Austin, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The plaintiff Dale Rina (hereinafter the plaintiff) was injured when he slipped and fell on ice in the driveway of a home owned by defendants Robert Silverman and Debra Laitman Silverman (hereinafter together the Silvermans), which was located inside a gated community. Thereafter, the plaintiff and his wife, suing derivatively, commenced this action against, among others, the Silvermans and the defendant DeBenedittis Landscaping, Inc., the company responsible under a contract with the defendant Windemere Home Owners Association, Inc., for snow removal services.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Supreme Court did not err in denying its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it. It did not establish, prima facie, that it did not launch a force or instrumentality of harm, or create or exacerbate a dangerous condition ( see Espinal v Melville Snow Contrs., 98 NY2d 136, 140; Cornell v 360 W. 51st St. Realty, LLC, 51 AD3d 469; Prenderville v International Serv. Sys., Inc., 10 AD3d 334, 337).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.

[ See 2008 NY Slip Op 32082(U).]


Summaries of

Rina v. Windemere Home Owners Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 13, 2009
66 A.D.3d 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Rina v. Windemere Home Owners Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:DALE RINA et al., Respondents, v. WINDEMERE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 13, 2009

Citations

66 A.D.3d 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 7391
887 N.Y.S.2d 231

Citing Cases

Polini v. Schindler Elevator Corp.

There are three circumstances under which a party who enters into a contract to render services may be said…

Mosca v. OCE Holding, Inc.

While we affirm the order appealed from, we do so on a ground other than that relied upon by the Supreme…