From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riley v. United States

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 30, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO 2:17cv644-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 30, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO 2:17cv644-MHT (WO)

11-30-2017

JOHN THOMAS RILEY, JR., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court:

(1) Petitioner's objections (doc. no. 4) are overruled.

(2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 3) is adopted.

(3) The 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition (doc. no. 2) is dismissed without prejudice because the required permission has not been obtained from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

DONE, this the 30th day of November, 2017.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Riley v. United States

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 30, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO 2:17cv644-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 30, 2017)
Case details for

Riley v. United States

Case Details

Full title:JOHN THOMAS RILEY, JR., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 30, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO 2:17cv644-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 30, 2017)