Opinion
A23D0198
01-23-2023
EDWARD THEODORE RILEY v. MANDELA GRAVES-FULGHAM.
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
On November 21, 2022, the trial court entered a final order on paternity requiring Edward Theodore Riley to pay child support. Proceeding pro se, Riley filed a timely application for discretionary appeal of the trial court's final order, which this Court denied. See Case No. A23D0189 (decided on January 17, 2023). On December 27, 2022, Riley filed another application for discretionary appeal seeking to appeal the November 21, 2022 final order. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
First, an application for discretionary review must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). Compliance with the time requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 is jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith. See Gable v. State, 290 Ga. 81, 82 (2) (a) (720 S.E.2d 170) (2011); Boyle v. State, 190 Ga.App. 734, 734 (380 S.E.2d 57) (1989). Riley's application, filed 36 days after entry of the order he seeks to appeal, is untimely.
Second, because we denied Riley's prior discretionary application seeking review of the same order, the doctrine of res judicata bars him from seeking further appellate review of the trial court's order. See Norris v. Norris, 281 Ga. 566, 567-568 (2) (642 S.E.2d 34) (2007); see also Echols v. State, 243 Ga.App. 775, 776 (534 S.E.2d 464) (2000) ("It is axiomatic that the same issue cannot be relitigated ad infinitum.") (punctuation omitted).
Accordingly, this application is hereby DISMISSED.