From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riggins v. Richards

Supreme Court of Texas
May 9, 1904
97 Tex. 526 (Tex. 1904)

Opinion

No. 1327.

Decided May 9, 1904.

Practice in Supreme Court — Title to Office.

Though the Supreme Court has granted a writ of error in a case involving the title to a public office, it will be dismissed upon expiration of the term of office in controversy before a decision has been reached.

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third District, in an appeal from McLennan County.

Waller S. Baker, for plaintiff in error.

Clark Bolinger, Wm. W. Ewing, and Allen D. Sanford, for defendants in error.


Since the application for the writ of error in this case was granted and before the cause could be reached for submission, the term of office the right to which is the matter in contention in the suit has expired. This is a motion to dismiss the case upon the ground stated. Upon the authority of the decision of this court in McWhorter v. Northcut, 94 Tex. 86, the motion must be granted. It is accordingly ordered that this case be dismissed, without prejudice to the relator's right to bring an action for his salary.

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Riggins v. Richards

Supreme Court of Texas
May 9, 1904
97 Tex. 526 (Tex. 1904)
Case details for

Riggins v. Richards

Case Details

Full title:J.W. RIGGINS v. B.C. RICHARDS ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: May 9, 1904

Citations

97 Tex. 526 (Tex. 1904)
80 S.W. 524

Citing Cases

Cowan v. State ex Rel. Scherck

In the trial of the case in August, 1938, it appeared from the face of relator's petition that the cause had…

Quadrant Corp. v. Ramo

We sustain the motion to dismiss the appeal. Pursuant to our authority to enter orders without prejudice,…