From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RIES v. WINONA COUNTY

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 31, 2010
Civil No. 10-1715 (JNE/JJK) (D. Minn. Aug. 31, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 10-1715 (JNE/JJK).

August 31, 2010


ORDER


This case is before the Court on a Report and Recommendation issued by the Honorable Jeffrey J. Keyes, United States Magistrate Judge, on July 28, 2010. The magistrate judge recommended that Defendant's motion to dismiss be granted in part and denied in part and that Defendant's motion for a jury trial be granted. Plaintiff objected to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 6] is GRANTED insofar as it seeks dismissal of Plaintiff's claim for discrimination based on Plaintiff's status as a veteran.
2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 6] is GRANTED insofar as it seeks dismissal of Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages under Title VII or the ADEA.
3. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 6] is otherwise DENIED.
4. Defendant's Motion for Jury Trial [Docket No. 16] is GRANTED.

Dated: August 31, 2010


Summaries of

RIES v. WINONA COUNTY

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 31, 2010
Civil No. 10-1715 (JNE/JJK) (D. Minn. Aug. 31, 2010)
Case details for

RIES v. WINONA COUNTY

Case Details

Full title:Robert A. Ries, Plaintiff, v. Winona County, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Aug 31, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 10-1715 (JNE/JJK) (D. Minn. Aug. 31, 2010)

Citing Cases

Hogsett v. Mercy Hosps. E. Cmtys.

In any event, other courts to consider the issue have held that substantively similar intake questionnaires…