From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ridgely v. Talbot J. Taylor and Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 9, 1909
90 N.E. 1165 (N.Y. 1909)

Opinion

Argued October 25, 1909

Decided November 9, 1909

Robert W. Candler and John Henry Hammond for appellants.

I.R. Oeland and Henry J. McDermott for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT and CHASE, JJ. Dissenting: GRAY and HISCOCK, JJ.


Summaries of

Ridgely v. Talbot J. Taylor and Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 9, 1909
90 N.E. 1165 (N.Y. 1909)
Case details for

Ridgely v. Talbot J. Taylor and Company

Case Details

Full title:A.N. RIDGELY, Respondent, v . TALBOT J. TAYLOR AND COMPANY et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 9, 1909

Citations

90 N.E. 1165 (N.Y. 1909)
90 N.E. 1165

Citing Cases

Ridgely v. Taylor and Company

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the appeal was considered and…

Jensen v. Union Railway Co.

We think the appeal was authorized because it is within the spirit of the section. A new trial was in effect…