From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ridener v. LDAR, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 8, 2000
771 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 2D98-1329.

Opinion filed November 8, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Lee E. Haworth, Judge.

Reversed and remanded with directions to reinstate Ridener's complaint.

Stanley E. Marable, Sarasota, for Appellant.

David P. Healy and Alan Harrison Brents of Katz, Kutter, Haigler, Alderman, Bryant Yon, P.A., Tallahassee, (withdrew after briefing) for Appellee.


Scott Ridener brought a whistle-blower claim against his former employer pursuant to section 448.103, Florida Statutes (1995). The trial court dismissed the suit with prejudice, relying on Potomac Systems Engineering, Inc. v. Deering, 683 So.2d 180 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), because Ridener had not provided written notice to the employer as a condition precedent to pursuing the claim. Following the trial court's dismissal, the Supreme Court of Florida decided Golf Channel v. Jenkins, 752 So.2d 561 (Fla. 2000), which overruled this court's decision in Potomac Systems. The supreme court's decision in Golf Channel is dispositive and requires us to reverse the trial court's dismissal.

Northcutt and Green, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Ridener v. LDAR, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 8, 2000
771 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Ridener v. LDAR, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT RIDENER, Appellant, v. LDAR, INC., a Florida corporation) d/b/a…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 8, 2000

Citations

771 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)