From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riddle v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville
Jul 31, 2009
No. 3:08-CV-132 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 31, 2009)

Opinion

No. 3:08-CV-132.

July 31, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This Social Security appeal is before the court on the report and recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge C. Clifford Shirley [Doc. 17]. There have been no timely objections to the report and recommendation, and enough time has passed since the filing of the report and recommendation to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

After a careful review of this matter, the court is in complete agreement with the magistrate judge's conclusion that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be denied and the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment be granted. Accordingly, the court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the report and recommendation under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). It is ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the report and recommendation, which the court adopts and incorporates into its ruling, that the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Doc. 11] is DENIED; the defendant Commissioner's motion for summary judgment [Doc. 15] is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Riddle v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville
Jul 31, 2009
No. 3:08-CV-132 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 31, 2009)
Case details for

Riddle v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MISTY D. RIDDLE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville

Date published: Jul 31, 2009

Citations

No. 3:08-CV-132 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 31, 2009)

Citing Cases

Morgan v. Commissioner of Social Security

The ALJ reasoned, in part, that Dr. Brocco had not treated Plaintiff directly. Tr. at 24. The ALJ further…

Gursky v. Colvin

Finally, it is deficient because, as the ALJ pointed out, it is incomplete. See Edwards v. Comm'r of Soc.…