From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ricketts v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
Feb 14, 2001
39 S.W.3d 391 (Tex. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 10-00-096-CR

Opinion issued and filed February 14, 2001

Appeal from the 82nd District Court, Robertson County, Texas, Trial Court # 96-05-15,963-CR.

Affirmed

Bruno A. Shimek, Bryan, for appellant.

John C. Paschall, Robertson County District Attorney, Franklin, for appellee.

Before Chief Justice Davis, Justice Vance, and Justice Gray.


OPINION


On January 31, 2000, Leslie Ricketts' probation was revoked and she was sentenced to eight months' confinement. Ricketts timely-filed her notice of appeal.

The Clerk's Record was filed on March 17, 2000, but no Reporter's Record has been filed with this Court. On October 18, 2000, this case was abated to the trial court with instructions to hold a hearing to determine (1) why no brief has been filed on Ricketts' behalf; (2) whether Ricketts desires to proceed with the appeal; and (3) whether Ricketts is indigent. Tex.R.App.P. 38.8(b)(1). Counsel for Ricketts was retained.

We have received a supplemental record of the hearing at which counsel stated that, after serving her eight-month jail sentence, Ricketts was released from prison. Counsel contends that he has no way of contacting Ricketts. He further states that, although Ricketts is not indigent, she has not paid for the reporter's record or his fee for pursuing the appeal. Thus, he cannot file a brief on her behalf. The Court made a finding that, "by her total failure and disinterest in maintaining contact with her attorney, [Ricketts] has abandoned her appeal." We have reinstated the appeal.

Because he has no contact with Ricketts, he likewise cannot certify compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), in filing a brief stating that the appeal is frivolous. Sutherland v. State, 658 S.W.2d 169, 170 (Tex.Crim.App. 1983).

Abating this case again would be useless. Sutherland v. State, 658 S.W.2d 169, 170 (Tex.Crim.App. 1983). Counsel has stated on the record that he cannot contact the appellant, that he does not believe she wants to pursue the appeal, and that she is not indigent.

We have carefully reviewed the record before us and find nothing that requires a reversal of this cause. See id.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Ricketts v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
Feb 14, 2001
39 S.W.3d 391 (Tex. App. 2001)
Case details for

Ricketts v. State

Case Details

Full title:LESLIE RICKETTS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco

Date published: Feb 14, 2001

Citations

39 S.W.3d 391 (Tex. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Parker v. State

Accordingly, we are considering this appeal without briefs. Id. (the appellate court may consider the appeal…