From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richter v. 210 Equities Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 15, 1995
216 A.D.2d 106 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 15, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Angela Mazzarelli, J.).


As the fourth-party plaintiff insurance broker does not and cannot dispute, it cannot look to the insurer for indemnification of the amount it must pay to its client solely by reason of its own negligence ( Fanta-Sea Swim Ctr. v. Rabin, 113 A.D.2d 1011). A party will not be permitted to use artful pleading to salvage, by rewording, a cause of action that is fatally deficient ( see, Matter of Entertainment Partners Group v. Davis, 198 A.D.2d 63, 64).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Rubin and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Richter v. 210 Equities Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 15, 1995
216 A.D.2d 106 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Richter v. 210 Equities Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CLAIRE RICHTER, Individually and as Parent and Guardian of JACQUELINE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 15, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 106 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
628 N.Y.S.2d 93