From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richmond v. Capers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 21, 1968
30 A.D.2d 976 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

October 21, 1968


Order of the Supreme Court, Ulster County, dated March 4, 1968 and entered in Dutchess County on March 6, 1968, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint, as barred by the Statute of Limitations (CPLR 3211, subd. [a], par. 5), reversed, on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. No questions of fact were considered. Judgment entered in Dutchess County upon said order on March 6, 1968 vacated. In our opinion, the complaint sounds in malpractice; and the Statute of Limitations as to such cause commences to run at the termination of the course of treatment "for the same or related * * * injuries" ( Borgia v. City of New York, 12 N.Y.2d 151, 157). The defendant physician having treated the plaintiff wife for an injury allegedly caused during surgery performed by him, a cause of action based on the injury did not accrue until the termination of the treatment. The action, then, was timely brought. Brennan, Acting P.J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Richmond v. Capers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 21, 1968
30 A.D.2d 976 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Richmond v. Capers

Case Details

Full title:VERNON C. RICHMOND et al., Appellants, v. ELLISON V. CAPERS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 21, 1968

Citations

30 A.D.2d 976 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

Wear v. State

Such a motion cannot be granted, unless it is made within two years after accrual of the claim. A cause of…