From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richey v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 30, 1917
76 So. 471 (Ala. Crim. App. 1917)

Opinion

7 Div. 450.

June 30, 1917.

Appeal from City Court of Anniston; Thos. W. Coleman, Jr., Judge.

Ed Richey was convicted of the crime of seduction, and appeals. Affirmed.

P.F. Wharton and Harvey A. Emerson, both of Anniston, for appellant. W.L. Martin, Atty. Gen., and P.W. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


The defendant was indicted for seduction. The indictment charges that, Ed Richey, alias, etc., a man, did, by means of temptation, deception, arts, flattery, or promise of marriage, seduce Margarte Tidwell, an unmarried woman, against the peace and dignity of the state of Alabama. The defendant was convicted on October 16, 1916. The appeal was taken on October 18, 1916. The time for signing and filing of the bill of exceptions having expired, and there appearing no bill of exceptions in the record, this court will not review the given and refused charges. Mitchell v. State, 15 Ala. App. 109, 72 So. 507; Paitry v. State, 196 Ala. 598, 72 So. 36.

The record is without error, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Richey v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 30, 1917
76 So. 471 (Ala. Crim. App. 1917)
Case details for

Richey v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICHEY v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jun 30, 1917

Citations

76 So. 471 (Ala. Crim. App. 1917)
76 So. 471

Citing Cases

Winchester v. State

In the absence of a bill of exceptions the requested written charges refused to the defendant cannot be…

Thomas v. State

There being no bill of exceptions, we cannot review the action of the trial court in refusing the written…