From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 28, 2001
778 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 1D00-4094.

Opinion filed February 28, 2001.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Michael R. Weatherby, Judge.

Reversed and Remanded.

Joseph Richardson, Jr., pro se, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; James W. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Attorneys, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Joseph Richardson, Jr., the appellant, seeks review of a summary denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion as procedurally barred and successive. As neither this Court nor the trial court addressed the merits of the appellant's first rule 3.800(a), the appellant's motion is not successive or procedurally barred.

We have twice held that the appellant's convictions arise out of a single criminal episode. In Richardson v. State, 500 So.2d 637 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), we held that the appellant's consecutive minimum mandatory sentences were precluded by Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1983) (prohibiting consecutive minimum mandatories for offenses arising out of a single criminal episode); and in Richardson v. State, 698 So.2d 551 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), we necessarily concluded that the appellant's offenses all arose out of a single criminal episode. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to enter amended sentences which run concurrently.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ERVIN, WEBSTER and LEWIS, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Richardson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 28, 2001
778 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Richardson v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH RICHARDSON, JR., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 28, 2001

Citations

778 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)