From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Millard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 1, 1969
33 A.D.2d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

December 1, 1969


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Schenectady County, granting respondent's motion for permission to serve an amended complaint to add G.E. Van Vorst Co., Inc., as a party defendant in this action. The instant appeal was taken by William H. Millard and not G.E. Van Vorst Co. Millard is not a party aggrieved within the meaning of CPLR 5511 by the order adding an additional defendant (7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N.Y. Civ. Prac., par. 5511.08). Accordingly, the appeal is improperly taken and must, therefore, be dismissed ( Matter of Cannan, 278 App. Div. 742). Appeal dismissed, without costs. Reynolds, J.P., Staley, Jr., Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.P.


Summaries of

Richardson v. Millard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 1, 1969
33 A.D.2d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Richardson v. Millard

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH RICHARDSON, Respondent, v. WILLIAM MILLARD, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1969

Citations

33 A.D.2d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Citing Cases

Patrylo v. Metro Fuel Oil Corp.

The appeal from so much of the order as granted those branches of the plaintiffs' cross motion which were…

Caballero v. Caballero

In the instant matter the defendant husband was not aggrieved by the order adding his sisters as necessary…