From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Johnson

United States District Court, N.D. Texas
Jul 25, 2001
No. 3:00-CV-2695-D (N.D. Tex. Jul. 25, 2001)

Opinion

No. 3:00-CV-2695-D

July 25, 2001


ORDER


After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.


Summaries of

Richardson v. Johnson

United States District Court, N.D. Texas
Jul 25, 2001
No. 3:00-CV-2695-D (N.D. Tex. Jul. 25, 2001)
Case details for

Richardson v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN DALE RICHARDSON, I.D. #290019, PETITIONER, v. GARY JOHNSON…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas

Date published: Jul 25, 2001

Citations

No. 3:00-CV-2695-D (N.D. Tex. Jul. 25, 2001)

Citing Cases

McFadden v. Davis

Thus, Petitioner did not diligently pursue habeas relief and is not entitled to equitable tolling. See…

Leigh v. Cockrell

The date on which Petitioner knew or should have known the factual predicate of his claims governs the…