Opinion
No. 95-1153.
January 24, 1996.
An Appeal from the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission.
Spiegelman Spiegelman and Robert I. Spiegelman, Miami, for appellant.
William T. Moore, Tallahassee, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
Finding that the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission reweighed the evidence in denying benefits to the appellant, we reverse with directions to enter an order confirming the findings of fact and award of the appeals referee. Holloman v. City of Quincy, 664 So.2d 310 (1995); Barreto v. Taco Bell Corp., 661 So.2d 874 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).
Reversed and remanded with directions.