From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richards v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct 31, 2012
103 So. 3d 912 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 4D12–71.

2012-10-31

Vincent RICHARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; David A. Haimes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 05–10271 CF10A. Fairuze Mohamed Sofia of the Sofia Law Firm, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant. No appearance required for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; David A. Haimes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 05–10271 CF10A.
Fairuze Mohamed Sofia of the Sofia Law Firm, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant. No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively to convictions that were final at the time that decision issued. Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), rev. granted,81 So.3d 414 (Fla.2012); Davis v. State, 69 So.3d 315 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). Further, at the time of the plea, appellant was clearly advised, and acknowledged that he understood, that his plea could result in his deportation. Flores v. State, 57 So.3d 218 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Appellant's allegation that the drug statute is unconstitutional is without merit. State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012); Maestas v. State, 76 So.3d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

GROSS, HAZOURI and GERBER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Richards v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct 31, 2012
103 So. 3d 912 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Richards v. State

Case Details

Full title:Vincent RICHARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Oct 31, 2012

Citations

103 So. 3d 912 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)