From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richards v. Brown

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 25, 2013
544 F. App'x 230 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-7180

10-25-2013

MARK E. RICHARDS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WENDY K. BROWN, Manager, Court and Legal Services Section, Virginia Department of Corrections, sued individual and official capacity; GARY L. BASS, Chief of Operations, Virginia Department of Corrections, sued individual and official capacity; LESLIE RITENOUR, Legal Researcher, Court and Legal Services Section, Virginia Department of Corrections, sued individual and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees.

Mark E. Richards, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00426-REP) Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark E. Richards, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mark E. Richards appeals the district court's orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as frivolous his complaint and denying his motion submitted under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richards v. Brown, No. 3:11-cv-00426-REP (E.D. Va. Sept. 18, 2012; June 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Richards v. Brown

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 25, 2013
544 F. App'x 230 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Richards v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:MARK E. RICHARDS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WENDY K. BROWN, Manager, Court…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 25, 2013

Citations

544 F. App'x 230 (4th Cir. 2013)