From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richard v. Norris

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Aug 11, 2009
NO. 5:09cv00087 BSM (E.D. Ark. Aug. 11, 2009)

Opinion

NO. 5:09cv00087 BSM.

August 11, 2009


ORDER


The court has reviewed the proposed findings and recommended disposition received from Magistrate Judge Jerry Cavaneau and the objections filed in response, and has further reviewed the relevant record de novo. The findings and recommendations are adopted in their entirety as this court's findings.

Accordingly, the 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 2) is hereby denied as untimely and this action is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. Petitioner's motion for jury trial (Doc. No. 11) is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Richard v. Norris

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Aug 11, 2009
NO. 5:09cv00087 BSM (E.D. Ark. Aug. 11, 2009)
Case details for

Richard v. Norris

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS E. RICHARD ADC #096904 PETITIONER v. LARRY NORRIS, Director…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

Date published: Aug 11, 2009

Citations

NO. 5:09cv00087 BSM (E.D. Ark. Aug. 11, 2009)

Citing Cases

Lewis v. Stewart

See § 2254(e). A collateral attack is not an action 'at law' to which the seventh amendment applies.");…

Davis v. Schnurr

Petitioner has no federal right to a jury trial in this matter. See Jefferson v. Jenkins, 2019 WL 1968055, *1…