From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richard Ledbetter v. J. I. Osborne

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1872
66 N.C. 379 (N.C. 1872)

Summary

In Ledbetter v. Osborne, 66 N.C. 379, after the recovery of a judgment by Osborne and docketing of a transcript, Ledbetter sought to set aside the judgment on a petition in the Superior Court on the ground of surprise and advantage taken of his ignorance, and (319) this Court on appeal held that the docketing of the transcript was to create a lien and for purposes of execution, and in that respect only was it a judgment of the Superior Court.

Summary of this case from Broyles v. Young

Opinion

(January Term, 1872.)

1. Where a judgment was obtained before a Justice of the Peace, and docketed in the office of the Superior Court Clerk. The Court has no power upon motion, to set aside said judgment, and enter the cause upon the civil issue docket.

2. If a party has merits and desires a new trial in the Superior Court, upon a matter heard before a Justice of the Peace, he must by a proper application, obtain a writ of recordari as a substitute for an appeal. The writ of recordari and not certiorari is the proper remedy, the Justice's Court not being a Court of record.

This was an application based upon a petition, to set aside a judgment, heard before Cannon, Judge, at Fall Term 1871, of Henderson Superior Court.

No Counsel for plaintiff.

J. H. Merrimon for defendant.


The facts stated in the case sent to this Court seem to be as follows: The plaintiff Ledbetter was indebted to one Noah Henry as administrator, as surety for one William Henry. He was sued by said administrator before a justice of the peace. The trial was postponed for a few days, shortly after the suit was brought, the note was transferred to J. I. Osborne. The warrant was amended, and suit carried on in Osborne's name, judgment was obtained before the Justice of the Peace. This judgment was docketed in Henderson and Buncombe counties. After the judgment was docketed, and execution about to issue from the Superior Court, Ledbetter filed a petition before His Honor, Judge Cannon, asking for an injunction, "and that said judgment may be opened and placed upon the civil issue docket as an appeal." A restraining order was granted.

The petition set forth facts tending to show surprise, and charging that advantage had been taken of petitioners ignorance of law, c.

The case being heard before His Honor, the petition was dismissed, and plaintiff Ledbetter appealed.


A judgment in a Justice's Court does not create a lien upon the property of the defendant. To have this effect a transcript of the judgment must be filed, and docketed in the office of the Superior Court clerk of the county, where the judgment rendered. C. C. P., sec. 503.

This proceeding places the judgment on the judgment docket of the Superior Court to create a lien and for the purposes of execution, and in this respect only is it a judgment of the Superior Court. The record of proceedings and the original papers in the cause remain in the Court of the Justice, and the case can only be regularly carried to the trial docket of the Superior Court by appeal.

This application is in the nature of a motion in the cause to set aside the judgment and grant a new trial upon the merits. The motion was properly refused by His Honor, as the case was corone non judice. If the plaintiff has merits, and has not been guilty of unreasonable laches, he may upon a proper application obtain a writ of recordari as a substitute for an appeal. The writ of recordari is the proper remedy, and not a certiorari. A Justice's Court is an inferior court of limited jurisdiction, not proceeding according to the course of common law, and although a justice is required to keep a docket and enter his proceedings, this does not constitute his court a court of record. When an appeal is taken from his judgment, he does not send up a duly certified transcript of record as the foundation of the action of the appellate Court, but he is also required to file the original papers in the cause. C. C. P., sec. 537, 540.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Richard Ledbetter v. J. I. Osborne

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1872
66 N.C. 379 (N.C. 1872)

In Ledbetter v. Osborne, 66 N.C. 379, after the recovery of a judgment by Osborne and docketing of a transcript, Ledbetter sought to set aside the judgment on a petition in the Superior Court on the ground of surprise and advantage taken of his ignorance, and (319) this Court on appeal held that the docketing of the transcript was to create a lien and for purposes of execution, and in that respect only was it a judgment of the Superior Court.

Summary of this case from Broyles v. Young

In Ledbetter v. Osborne, 66 N.C. 379, it is held, that where a judgment was obtained before a Justice of the Peace, and docketed in the office of the Superior Court Clerk, the Court has no power upon motion, to set aside said judgment and enter the cause upon the civil issue docket.

Summary of this case from Birdsey v. Harris

In Ledbetter v. Osborne, 66 N.C. 379, it is held, although the docketing of a Justice's judgment in the Superior Court has the effect of making it a judgment of the Superior Court for the purposes of a lien and of having execution, still it remains a judgment of the Justice's Court, and a motion to vacate will not lie in the Superior Court, and the case can only be taken up to the Superior Court by appeal, or writ of recordari.

Summary of this case from Hutchison v. Symons
Case details for

Richard Ledbetter v. J. I. Osborne

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD LEDBETTER vs . J. I. OSBORNE

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1872

Citations

66 N.C. 379 (N.C. 1872)

Citing Cases

Reeves v. Davis

3. Ordinarily, it is the duty of a justice of the peace of pronounce his judgment on the day of trial, but in…

Morton v. Rippy

A judgment can be vacated only by the court which rendered it. ( Ledbetter v. Osborne, 66 N.C. 379; Birdsey…