Argued November 20, 1916
Decided December 5, 1916
Hugh Satterlee for appellant.
Earl F. Case for respondent.
Order affirmed, with costs; first and third questions certified answered in the affirmative; second question in the negative; no opinion.
Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, CARDOZO and POUND, JJ.
Full title:CLARK H. RICE, Respondent, v . POSTAL TELEGRAPH-CABLE COMPANY, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Dec 5, 1916
The right of action is vested by section 1902 in the executor or administrator of the deceased for the…
Stutz v. Guardian Cab Corp.This requirement as to time within which to bring suit has been considered a limitation upon the remedy and…