From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rice v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 1997
239 A.D.2d 400 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 12, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the defendant's motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action to recover damages for wrongful death asserted in the complaint is granted, and the complaint is dismissed in its entirety.

The decedent and a friend were riding on top of an elevator managed, maintained, and operated by the appellant. At some point, the decedent moved onto a ledge on the elevator shaft, intending to jump back on top of the ascending elevator. However, he slipped and fell between the elevator and the wall of the elevator shaft. He died when the ascending elevator crushed him against the wall.

That branch of the appellant's motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff's wrongful death cause of action should have been granted. "[T]he proximate cause of the decedent's death was his own willful behavior in engaging in hazardous and illegal conduct, and compensation should not be granted in such circumstances" (Tillmon v. New York City Hous. Auth., 203 A.D.2d 19, 20; see, De Pena v. New York City Tr. Auth., 236 A.D.2d 209; Porter v. New York City Hous. Auth., 150 Misc.2d 67).

Rosenblatt, J.P., Copertino, Pizzuto, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rice v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 1997
239 A.D.2d 400 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Rice v. New York City Housing Authority

Case Details

Full title:JOANNE H. RICE, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 12, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 400 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
658 N.Y.S.2d 347

Citing Cases

Wade v. New York City Transit Auth.

Thus, the risk was open and obvious, and understood and fully assessed by plaintiff (see Barker, 63 NY2d at…

Hinchey v. Willow

Even if the defendant were somehow negligent in maintaining its premises, it had no duty to warn of any…