From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ricci v. W.T. Grant Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 1968
29 A.D.2d 961 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

April 8, 1968


Appeal by defendant and third-party plaintiff, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 31, 1967, as (1) on reargument adhered (with an exception, i.e., granting a time extension) to the original decision which, in opening appellant's default in appearing and answering the complaint, imposed certain conditions and (2) denied appellant relief as to the third-party defendant. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by adding a further exception to the adhering direction, namely, a provision striking out the condition in the original decision (order dated June 14, 1967) requiring appellant to "post a bond or other security in the amount of $10,000 to secure any judgment that might be rendered herein against the said defendant, Johnson Security Bureau." As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. The time within which appellant may comply with the remaining condition (payment of a full bill of taxable costs) is further extended until 20 days after service of a copy of the order entered hereon, with notice of entry. In our opinion, there was no willful default by appellant in failing to appear or answer; and therefore appellant should not have been required to give a bond or other security in the amount of $10,000 to secure any judgment that might be rendered herein against it. Christ, Acting P.J., Brennan, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ricci v. W.T. Grant Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 1968
29 A.D.2d 961 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Ricci v. W.T. Grant Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN RICCI, Respondent, v. W.T. GRANT CO. et al., Defendants, and JOHNSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 8, 1968

Citations

29 A.D.2d 961 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

Kolodziejski v. Jen-Mar Elec. Serv. Corp.

Furthermore, even if timely, the Court declines to grant a prejudgment attachment. The default was excusable…