From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rhodes v. Westoak Realty

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Nov 18, 1997
955 S.W.2d 827 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

No. 72208

Date: November 18, 1997

Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Julian L. Bush

Elbert A. Walton, Jr., Counsel for Appellant. Robert C. Jones, Jr., Counsel for Respondent.

Grimm, P.J., Pudlowski and Gaertner, JJ., concur.


Appellants, Sandra Rhodes, Gennean Gillespie, and Otis Beckum ("plaintiffs"), appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis dismissing their petition filed against respondents, Westoak Realty Investment, Inc., and Robert C. Jones ("defendants"), for failure to state a claim.

As an initial matter, this Court must determine whether it has jurisdiction to entertain the issues raised before it. Skaggs v. Skaggs, 938 S.W.2d 302 (Mo.App.E.D. 1997). In order to invoke this Court's jurisdiction, the parties must appeal a written decree or order which has been signed by the trial judge and denominated a "judgment." Rule 74.01(a); City of St. Louis v. Hughes, No. 79514, Slip Op. at 6 (Mo.banc August 19, 1997). Such designation may appear at the top of the document, in the body of the writing, or in the form of a docket entry. Hughes, Slip Op. at 7. The record before us lacks any indication the order entered by the trial court was designated a "judgment" as required for appeals purposes. See id. Accordingly, this Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

Based on the foregoing, the appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Rhodes v. Westoak Realty

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Nov 18, 1997
955 S.W.2d 827 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Rhodes v. Westoak Realty

Case Details

Full title:SANDRA RHODES, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. WESTOAK REALTY, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Nov 18, 1997

Citations

955 S.W.2d 827 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)