From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rhodes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 2, 1996
683 So. 2d 640 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 94-3577.

December 2, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Liberty County; Philip J. Padovano, Judge.

Steven R. Andrews of The Law Offices of Steven R. Andrews, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; James W. Rogers, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


In this direct criminal appeal, appellant's appointed counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Although afforded an opportunity to file a brief in proper person, appellant has elected not to do so. Having carefully reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. Accordingly, we affirm appellant's convictions and sentences. However, we remand with directions that the $2.00 cost imposed for Criminal Justice Education by Municipalities and Counties be stricken, because this was a discretionary cost pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), and could not be imposed without affording appellant notice and an opportunity to be heard. E.g., Brooks v. State, 676 So.2d 48 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

MINER, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rhodes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 2, 1996
683 So. 2d 640 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Rhodes v. State

Case Details

Full title:Allen RHODES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 2, 1996

Citations

683 So. 2d 640 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

On remand, the trial court shall give the appellant an opportunity to be heard regarding the imposition of…