From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rhodes v. Sheriff

Supreme Court of Nevada
Oct 5, 1977
569 P.2d 405 (Nev. 1977)

Opinion

No. 10139

October 5, 1977

Appeal from order denying pretrial petition for writ of habeas corpus, Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Paul S. Goldman, J.

Manos Cherry and Michael Cherry, Las Vegas, for Appellant.

Robert List, Attorney General, Carson City; George E. Holt, District Attorney, and H. Leon Simon, Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.


OPINION


After being ordered to stand trial for the possession of a controlled substance (marijuana), in violation of NRS 453.336 and NRS 453.161, Daniel Lee Rhodes petitioned for habeas corpus. His petition was denied and this appeal has been perfected.

The contraband which appellant is accused of "constructively" possessing was found in a suitcase which police officers, without a warrant, had removed from a closet of a residence appellant was visiting.

In a recent case, involving similar facts, where the officer had a warrant, we wrote that to support a charge of possession that it was necessary to offer proof that the accused "exercised dominion and control over the contraband." Oxborrow v. Sheriff, 93 Nev. 321, 565 P.2d 652 (1977). This record is barren of such proof.

It is also barren of facts that might support a theory of "joint possession" such as existed in Maskaly v. State, 85 Nev. 111, 450 P.2d 790 (1969), and Woerner v. State, 85 Nev. 281, 453 P.2d 1004 (1969).

Accordingly, we reverse.


Summaries of

Rhodes v. Sheriff

Supreme Court of Nevada
Oct 5, 1977
569 P.2d 405 (Nev. 1977)
Case details for

Rhodes v. Sheriff

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL LEE RHODES, APPELLANT, v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Oct 5, 1977

Citations

569 P.2d 405 (Nev. 1977)
569 P.2d 405

Citing Cases

Sheriff v. Fernandez

Respondent first argues that his physical presence during the sale of narcotics by Bella is insufficient to…