From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynoso v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 13, 2007
43 A.D.3d 1209 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 500050.

September 13, 2007.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McCarthy, J.), entered January 30, 2006 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Ignacio Reynoso, Auburn, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.


Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding by order to show cause to challenge a determination finding him guilty of engaging in a sexual act, lewd exposure and creating a disturbance. Supreme Court granted respondents' motion to dismiss the proceeding for lack of personal jurisdiction. This appeal ensued.

We affirm. The record reveals that petitioner failed to comply with the service requirements of the order to show cause. Moreover, petitioner made no showing that obstacles presented by his imprisonment prevented him from adhering to the order's mandates. Accordingly, Supreme Court properly granted respondents' motion to dismiss ( see Matter of Jones v Dennison, 30 AD3d 952, 953; Matter of Barclay v State of New York Dept. of Correctional Servs., 22 AD3d 974, 974-975).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Reynoso v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 13, 2007
43 A.D.3d 1209 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Reynoso v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of IGNACIO REYNOSO, Appellant, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 13, 2007

Citations

43 A.D.3d 1209 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 6596
842 N.Y.S.2d 102

Citing Cases

Murray v. Fischer

We affirm. It is well settled that an inmate's failure to comply with the service requirements of an order to…

Matter of Murray v. New York State Dept.

As of December 28, 2009, the Division of Parole had not been served with an executed order to show cause,…