From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynolds v. Hults

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 20, 1950
276 App. Div. 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Opinion

February 20, 1950.


In consolidated actions, to recover moneys advanced and the amounts due upon corporate certificates of indebtedness, order granting respondents' motion for leave to cure defaults in making payments under a stipulation of settlement reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, without costs. The order clearly was in contravention of the order dated November 16, 1949, and should not have been made by a court of co-ordinate jurisdiction. Carswell, Acting P.J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 1022.]


Summaries of

Reynolds v. Hults

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 20, 1950
276 App. Div. 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)
Case details for

Reynolds v. Hults

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK L. REYNOLDS, Appellant, v. R. BURCHARD HULTS, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 20, 1950

Citations

276 App. Div. 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Citing Cases

Deer Park Restaurant Inc. v. O'Neill

Such practice has been repeatedly disapproved. ( Platt v. New York S.B.R. Co., 170 N.Y. 451; Reynolds v.…

De Windt v. O'Leary

Ellis v. Central Hanover Bank Trust Co., 198 Misc. 912, 102 N.Y.S.2d 337. See also Platt v. New York Sea…