From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reyes v. Lexington 79th Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 13, 2017
149 A.D.3d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

04-13-2017

Walker REYES, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. LEXINGTON 79TH CORP, et al., Defendants–Appellants.

Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP, New York (Nancy Quinn Koba of counsel), for appellants.


Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP, New York (Nancy Quinn Koba of counsel), for appellants.

FRIEDMAN, J.P., RICHTER, MAZZARELLI, FEINMAN, GISCHE, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laura G. Douglas, J.), entered June 10, 2015, which to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, denied defendants' motion to compel discovery of plaintiff's medical, psychological, psychiatric, and academic records, and income tax returns, unanimously modified

, on the law, to grant the motion to the extent of requiring plaintiff to provide authorizations for production of his medical, psychological, and psychiatric records, for the period beginning five years before the accident, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The material and necessary standard is to be interpreted liberally to require disclosure of any facts bearing on the controversy which will assist preparation for trial by sharpening the issues and reducing prolixity (see Allen v. Crowell–Collier Publ. Co., 21 N.Y.2d 403, 406, 288 N.Y.S.2d 449, 235 N.E.2d 430 [1968] ).

Plaintiff alleged that he sustained numerous physical and psychological injuries, including depression, from the accident, and that they permanently impacted his ability to work. Defendants are entitled to disclosure of his entire medical history, including any psychological or psychiatric records, because his overall health directly bears on how many years he realistically could have continued to work had no accident occurred (see Velez v. Daar, 41 A.D.3d 164, 166, 838 N.Y.S.2d 44 [1st Dept.2007] ).

However, defendant failed to demonstrate that plaintiff's school records and tax returns were relevant and material (see Monica W. v. Milevoi, 252 A.D.2d 260, 262, 685 N.Y.S.2d 231 [1st Dept.1999] ; Nanbar Realty Corp. v. Pater Realty Co., 242 A.D.2d 208, 209–210, 661 N.Y.S.2d 216 [1st Dept.1997] ).


Summaries of

Reyes v. Lexington 79th Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 13, 2017
149 A.D.3d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Reyes v. Lexington 79th Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Walker REYES, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. LEXINGTON 79TH CORP, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 13, 2017

Citations

149 A.D.3d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
149 A.D.3d 508
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 2894

Citing Cases

Joseph v. Edun

In this personal injury action, plaintiff alleges that he was injured when defendant's vehicle hit a truck…

Vore v. Seaport Glob. Holdings

CPLR 3101(a)(1) provides that "[t]here shall be full disclosure of all matter material and necessary in the…