From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reyes v. Charles H. Greenthal Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 6, 2005
24 A.D.3d 131 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

7272.

December 6, 2005.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane S. Solomon, J.), entered December 24, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, denied plaintiff's motion to renew her opposition to defendant's previously granted motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Saxe, Nardelli and Malone, JJ., concur.


Plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact with respect to the claims asserted in the complaint against defendant, the managing agent retained by the receiver of the building in which the infant plaintiff allegedly contracted lead poisoning. The matter submitted by plaintiff in support of renewal contained no new facts unavailable at the time of the original motion and provided no ground for the court to conclude that the claim of active negligence had been permissibly asserted ( see CPLR 2221 [e]).


Summaries of

Reyes v. Charles H. Greenthal Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 6, 2005
24 A.D.3d 131 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Reyes v. Charles H. Greenthal Co.

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER REYES, an Infant, by Her Legal Guardian, RAMONA LOPEZ, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 6, 2005

Citations

24 A.D.3d 131 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
806 N.Y.S.2d 141

Citing Cases

Mohammed v. St. Barnabas Hosp.

The court properly denied plaintiff's motion insofar as it sought renewal. Plaintiff failed to present any…

Heather James, LLC v. Day & Meyer, Murray & Young Corp.

Defendant's motion to renew is not based on any new law, since this Court's prior decision affirming the…