From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rex Finance Co. v. Morehead

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit
Dec 5, 1960
124 So. 2d 776 (La. Ct. App. 1960)

Opinion

No. 21266.

December 5, 1960.

Appeal from an adverse judgment of the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Division D, Rene A. Viosca, J. The Court of Appeal, Samuel, J., held that where appellant has not pointed out any error in judgment of lower court, judgment will be affirmed under presumption that it is correct.

Judgment affirmed.

George M. Brooks and James O. Brooks, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

Gerald Netter, Charles J. Rivet and Charles L. Rivet, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee.


The appellant did not make an appearance when this case was regularly called for argument, nor has he filed a brief herein. The appellee alone has appeared and he has submitted the case and moved that the judgment be affirmed.

Since the appellant has not pointed out any error in the judgment of the lower court, that judgment may be affirmed under the presumption that it is correct. Delpit v. Delpit, 1957, 232 La. 539, 94 So.2d 660; Perkins et al. v. Buchler et al., 1953, 223 La. 179, 65 So.2d 130; Succession of Bailey, 1957, 232 La. 824, 95 So.2d 326.

We have examined the record and find no error patent on the face thereof.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, appellant to pay all costs.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Rex Finance Co. v. Morehead

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit
Dec 5, 1960
124 So. 2d 776 (La. Ct. App. 1960)
Case details for

Rex Finance Co. v. Morehead

Case Details

Full title:REX FINANCE COMPANY v. Mitchell MOREHEAD, Sr

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 5, 1960

Citations

124 So. 2d 776 (La. Ct. App. 1960)

Citing Cases

Modern Appliance & Supply, Inc. v. Sapp

There is a strong presumption that a trial court judgment is valid and that the trial judge acted upon proper…

Garrison v. Kuntz

Since the appellant has not pointed out any error in the judgment of the lower court, that judgment may be…