From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reuter v. Medtronics, Inc.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Nov 23, 2010
Civil Action No. 10-3019 WJM (D.N.J. Nov. 23, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-3019 WJM.

November 23, 2010


ORDER


A Report and Recommendation was filed on November 5, 2010 recommending that this civil action be remanded to the Superior Court of New Jersey, and the request for attorney fees be denied; and the parties having been given notice that they had ten days to object to the Report and Recommendation pursuant to Local Rule 72.1(c)(2); no objection or responses having been received; and the Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation de novo; and good cause appearing;

It is on this 23 day of November, 2010

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate-Judge Mark Falk is hereby adopted as the Opinion of this Court and; and it is further ORDERED that this matter is remanded to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County; and it is further

ORDERED that the Plaintiff's request for attorney fees and costs be denied.


Summaries of

Reuter v. Medtronics, Inc.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Nov 23, 2010
Civil Action No. 10-3019 WJM (D.N.J. Nov. 23, 2010)
Case details for

Reuter v. Medtronics, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NANCY REUTER and JACK REUTER, Plaintiff, v. MEDTRONICS, INC., et als…

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Nov 23, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-3019 WJM (D.N.J. Nov. 23, 2010)

Citing Cases

Tolia v. Brands

Finally, "for fraudulent joinder to apply, the claim must be 'wholly insubstantial and frivolous.'" Reuter v.…

Saviour v. S. William Stavropoulos, M.D.

The doctrine of fraudulent misjoinder "refers to a situation where a plaintiff attempts to frustrate a…